
Am part of the way into my first viewing of the new
Pride and Prejudice (2005), and I have to stop and register my sorrow, or surely my head will explode.
So many annoying things, all in one small frame.
Everyone in here seems like they haven’t acted since tenth grade drama class (even, at times, my beloved Donald Sutherland!), and all the hairdos seems to have been excess wigs bought from the touring company of
Canada: A Peoples’ History.
Lizzy, who talks like she is continually sucking on a lozenge, is somewhere between Belle from
Beauty and the Beast and a truck stop waitress.
Although she is…
tolerable, I suppose.
(At least she is younger than Jennifer Ehle, so that is some plus.)
And Kitty, who is usually the better of the two slut-sisters, seems to have been drugged, and her lines appear to consist of nothing more than peels of unreasonable laughter and hysterical gasps.
My teeth are set on edge, as every sentence is read as fast air leaving a whoopee cushion, making me check the speed on the DVD player four times already. Come on, guys, I know it is a long book, but speed of speech may not be the best solution!
The costumes all seem from every which way (and, yes, many seem to have hitch-hiked in from France), and the house full of chattering girls seems to have mistaken Jane Austen for Louisa May Alcott. And I am completely baffled by Mr. and Mrs. Bennett lip-smooching in the living room, as if they were baby boomers preparing to take the kiddies off to soccer practice. This is hardly what I expected from them… Actually, when I first read the book as a child, they seemed so distant I wondered if they were even related at all - I wondered why their nanny was called "Mrs. Bennett".
Aside from the attractive agricultural scenes, the camera work is obtrusive and over-blown (as in, what was with that slow close-in on an unimportant glass of cider for no less than 10 seconds?), and the unbearably-simple-minded Bingley (who is seriously an idiot) appears to have puffed up his bright red pompadour with a bicycle pump (gaze at the horror that is the
Red Pompadour, above). WTF?
Don’t get me wrong – Bingley has never been the brightest bulb in the pack, but I have never, ever pictured him as bad as he is portrayed here, by some guy who looks all the world like he could be Paul Bettany’s mentally challenged younger cousin.
Oh, and Judi Dench as Lady Catherine de Bourg? What incredibly
innovative casting! (Since sarcasm doesn’t come through blog posts, I will highlight it there.) Not only is this a lame and predictable move, but it is also not at all correct. Judi Dench has a lovely hint of true sparkle and humour under any severity she possesses, so she is the last person I would have cast for this malevolent creature.
Now, Brenda Blethyn! There is a wonderful choice for Mrs. Bennett. (No sarcasm.) Pity they couldn’t give her anything worthy of her.
Right now, I can’t even really get into Darcy (the meat-head upstage left, reading his lines at the speed of an auctioneer), because my gorge would fly open with such a violence as to shatter my computer monitor.
But, incidentally, is it only me who finds it terribly, terribly wrong for him to have a bust of himself in his own gallery at his age?? As if all the nude Greek men decorating his bachelor pad weren’t bad enough, it seems he is also horribly vain and pathetically silly. Lovely.
Arrggh! Only half way through, and I am already inclined to throw this piece of tripe out a window. This is the only second I have spent being glad this thing is shorter than the book deserves – four more hours, and I would go out the window with it.
This is interminable. Fighting… to…
not… open… solitaire… program. Must pay… attention! (I’ve already paused once to scan for viruses, thinking something this bad
must be contagious.)
Sad, sad day. I didn’t expect to love it, but I didn’t expect complete hatred. I had expected something around the level of
Emma (1998) – lightweight, abbreviated, pleasant, pop… but not a travesty of taste and style.
At best, I am hoping this end up as not a
totally regrettable experience.
This is really too bad. I had assumed that an adequate version of
P&P would be better than no
P&P at all, but now I am uncertain.
Then again, “adequate” may be complimenting this version
too much.