_

Well, I finally broke down and hit the Blockbuster for some previously-viewed fun (see my list from Friday). I loaded up on hipster-rom-coms, with
Adventureland,
(500) Days of Summer and
Paper Heart. After all that, I might end up shagging my hair and getting some grungy jeans with a grey hoodie. Maybe some white ear buds, too. It could be life-altering.
In any case, I finally saw
Adventureland, which was one I have wanted to see for a while. Was I wrong? Not at all. I very much enjoyed
Adventureland, and have no doubt that I will watch it again, and will show/lend it to others.
For those who have not seen it,
Adventureland is set in a 1987 amusement park, in which a young university grad (Jesse Eisenberg) - who is a bit too nice to live in that world - seeks summer employment because his father's money issues have scuttled his hopes of Columbia grad school. Finding a resume of Renaissance lit and lawn mowing is not really pulling in the offers, this claptrap fair is about all he can get, and this is reflected in the ad hoc group of weirdos who have also taken refuge there.
The oddest thing about
Adventureland is that I found myself constantly wondering how these "kids" were in bars; for some reason, my head was convinced they were all highschool grads, not college grads. Not many of them have an ounce of conventionally-measured maturity, not even the "grown up" maintenance man, played by Ryan Reynolds (who I have to admit I am finally warming up to a bit). But many of them do have heart; it's just hidden under disappointment. In the end, the film actually plays like a
Punch Drunk Love for twentysomethings; a group of slightly-off people swimming in quiet desperation and various intense hatreds. But their issues are funny, so I guess it's acceptable, right?
It might not be great art, but, then, who says that is required of every film?
However, one thing it does have: Martin Starr. Where has this guy been since Freaks and Geeks, and why didn't I realize how much I missed him? Actually, he has been doing things since F&G, according to his IMDb, but I guess I didn't notice him; I have only a vague recollection of him in Knocked Up. Clearly, his roles over the past while have not been as startlingly effective for mounting for his talents as this one. I am reminded how much of a fan of this guy I really am. For that reason alone, it was worth seeing Adventureland, and I hope we get to see more of Starr, who, for me, was the real highlight (and centre of much of the drama and emotion) of this movie.
Adventureland predictable, falls into the ridiculous myth that pot is somehow an essential to transformative experiences, and commits that crime of first complicating relationship problems for drama only to over-simplify relationship problems for the conclusion, but it's still well worth watching.
So, I was correct on that one... Can't wait to see how I fare on the other two.
***
ETA: Adventureland was also worth adding to my dissertation, to beef up the 2009 film count! Happy happenstance. Gotta love that!